THE JEFFREY MACDONALD CASE

For researchers of the Jeffrey MacDonald case: The murders of Colette, Kimberley and Kristen MacDonald

EXHIBITS AND FINDINGS



ca. September 2, 1970


USACIL Report
P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11 (Addendum)

Click the USACIL Scans and Transcripts button above to download all files from
USACIL Reports




USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11 (Addendum)

USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11 (Addendum)

 USACIL Report P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11 (Addendum)
 Click icon to expand and reduce original image.  Drag the expanded image to move it.



                                           DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
                               USA CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION LABORATORY
                                         FORT GORDON, GEORGIA 30905


        ADDENDUM TO
        LABORATORY REPORT                                        UNIT CASE NUMBER
        NUMBER  P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11                            MPR 1277-70


        CONTRIBUTOR:      Detachment Commander, Det B, 3d MP Gp (CI)
                          Ft Bragg, NC 28307

        SUSPECT:          MacDONALD, Jeffrey R.


        VICTIM:           MacDONALD, Mrs. Collette S.; MacDONALD, Kimberly;
                          MacDONALD, Kristen

        OFFENSE:          Murder

        _______________________________________________________________________________
        RECEIVED                     HOW RECEIVED                       RECEIVED BY

                     As listed on P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11

        RETURNED                     HOW RETURNED
                             2 Sep 70                R# 27574
        _______________________________________________________________________________
        EVIDENCE EXAMINED:  As listed on P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11
        1.  Deference letter, AJBJA-MJ, SJA, Ft Bragg, NC., dated 25 August 1970,
        Subj: Clarification of Lab Report No. P-FA-D-C-FP-82-70-R-11 dated 29 July
        1970.

        2.  The following statements are to be added to page 2 of subject report
        for clarification:

             a.  Therefore, it is the opinion of the examiners that the hairs of
        Exhibits E-4 and E-5 probably did not originate from the same point
        sources as the hairs of Exhibits E-305 through E-313.

             b.  However, it must be pointed out that the requsted opinion
        regarding positively eliminating the subject as a possible source of the
        hair cannot be given without first examining numerous other print sources
        of body hair from the subject.

                                                        /s/
                                                        JANICE SUPER GLISSON, DAC
                                                        029-14-3515
                                                        Chemist

        /s/                                             /s/
        JAMES PATRICK RYAN                              ARTHUR BOYD CONNERS, DAC
        CW4, USA                                        546-30-1595
        Acting Commander                                Chief, Chemistry Division